Buy Kitchen Equipment
Buy Kitchen Equipment ->->->-> https://tiurll.com/2tlvTy
A paring knife is a kitchen knife with a short blade that can be used for a multitude of tasks. You can peel and chop with it, and the small tip is great for fine work like coring strawberries (or similar).
Our recommended oven mitts from Kitchen Elements are made of silicone with a cotton interior and are dishwasher safe. Plus, they can be cleaned very easily and even look stylish! Whether you choose to purchase our recommended pick or another option, make sure you have quality oven mitts before beginning any high-heat oven cooking. A good pair of oven mitts is a must have for any kitchen.
These bags come in a 13-gallon size, which works well for taller trash bins that aren't stored under the sink. They also have reinforcing bands woven throughout the bag which makes them extremely tough and sturdy - a nice feature that gives peace of mind when carrying a full bag. Whether you use these bags in your busy kitchen or even in the office, you won't be disappointed.
It has custom handles on the inside of the bin that holds grocery bags in place so they never sag when filled with trash. Even the step that opens the can is designed well - it works with a small amount of pressure and has a soft-close feature that won't make a racket when you close the lid. Overall, this is a fantastic bin for use under the sink in your kitchen or bathrooms.
Leasing and renting restaurant equipment have several benefits that allow businesses to save up on precious starting capital to manage the running costs. Here are some of the core benefits of leasing and renting restaurant equipment:
Purchasing equipment upfront is another option for business owners. It allows businesses to own their equipment and cut down on their monthly expenses. Buying commercial kitchen equipment encompasses both new and used equipment. All equipment you purchase must be reliable, durable, and must have a long operational lifespan.
While each of these options is equally valid for business owners looking to set up their commercial kitchen, some options might not be right for you. While buying equipment can help you save money in the long run, it also has an impact on your starting capital. On the other hand, leasing comes with monthly expenses, however, it also allows you to purchase the device or upgrade to a higher model at the end of the lease period. Get in touch with a financial advisor to get a better understanding of what suits your establishment the best.
Foodservice equipment forms the core of each restaurant. Acquiring quality equipment remains the focus of most business owners at the start of their operations. With improvements in payment options and in the variety of equipment itself, a variety of alternatives now exist for business owners. Whether you buy, lease, or rent restaurant equipment, ensure the quality of the machines you procure is up to the mark.
The U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM) may use appropriated funds to purchase refrigerators, microwaves, and commercial coffee makers for central kitchen areas in its new headquarters building. Appropriations are available to pay for items ordinarily considered to be personal in nature, such as kitchen appliances, when the primary benefit of their use accrues to the agency, notwithstanding a collateral benefit to the individual. USPACOM has demonstrated that equipping the workplace in this manner is reasonably related to the efficient performance of agency activities and provides other benefits to the agency, including assurance of a safe workplace. Earlier GAO decisions reflecting similar proposed uses of appropriations, such as B-276601, June 26, 1997, B-210433, Apr. 15, 1983, and 47Comp. Gen. 657 (1968), are modified accordingly.
The U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM) may use appropriated funds to purchase refrigerators, microwaves, and commercial coffee makers for central kitchen areas in its new headquarters building.Appropriations are available to pay for items ordinarily considered to be personal in nature, such as kitchen appliances, when the primary benefit of their use accrues to the agency, notwithstanding a collateral benefit to the individual.USPACOM has demonstrated that equipping the workplace in this manner is reasonably related to the efficient performance of agency activities and provides other benefits to the agency, including assurance of a safe workplace. Earlier GAO decisions reflecting similar proposed uses of appropriations, such as B-276601, June26, 1997, B-210433, Apr. 15, 1983, and 47Comp. Gen. 657 (1968), are modified accordingly.
In applying this decision, agencies should develop an agency policy to ensure uniformity in the use of appropriations to acquire this equipment and determine the usefulness of appliances such as these in light of operational benefits, such as employee health and productivity, and the responsibility to provide a safe work environment.
The Chief of Staff of the U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM), U.S. Army, has requested an advance decision under 31 U.S.C. 3529 on the propriety of using appropriated funds to procure major kitchen appliances, such as refrigerators, microwaves, and commercial quality coffee makers, that would be placed in common areas for the use of personnel at the site. As explained below, because we have determined that the appliances contribute to the efficient operation of the agency, and USPACOM, not individual employees, receives the primary benefit of the expenditure, USPACOM's operation and maintenance appropriation is available to purchase the appliances for general employee use.
On March 7, 2004, USPACOM moved into its new headquarters in the Nimitz-MacArthur Pacific Command Center (Center). The new facility has about 20 inter-division kitchen areas complete with plumbed sinks, cupboards, and storage cabinets. Although the Center has a small concession area, it is not adequate to meet the needs of the 1,100 military and civilian personnel who work in the building. Further, USPACOM has directed that, in the interest of fire safety and for the protection of Center personnel and property, personnel are not allowed to have personal coffee makers in their offices. In light of this restriction, USPACOM installed commercial grade coffee makers into the existing plumbing in the kitchen areas, at a cost of12,210.95. In making the decision to install the coffeemakers, USPACOM determined that it was the minimum necessary to support the building's working population, since personnel \"in the USPACOM secure Command Center who are unable to leave the working area will be provided with essential refreshment,\" thus increasing employee productivity and morale while enhancing fire safety. Memo J02-002-04 from Major General Ronald L. Lowe, U.S. Army, Chief of Staff, USPACOM, to Tom Armstrong, Assistant General Counsel, GAO, April 16, 2004, at 2. However, based on prior GAO case law, USPACOM has deferred purchasing other appliances, such as refrigerators and microwaves, to outfit these kitchen areas pending GAO's decision. Id. at 1.
The general rule is that where an appropriation is not specifically available for a particular item, its purchase may be authorized as a necessary expense if there is a reasonable relationship between the object of the expenditure and the general purpose for which the funds were appropriated, so long as the expenditure is not otherwise prohibited by law. 66Comp. Gen. 356 (1987). This rule, the necessary expense rule, recognizes an agency's discretion in using its appropriation to fulfill its purposes. Id. However, appropriated funds generally are not available for personal furnishings of employees without specific statutory authority if such items are \"for the personal convenience, comfort, or protection of such employees, or are such as to be reasonably required as a part of the usual and necessary equipment for the work on which they are engaged or for which they are employed.\" 3Comp. Gen. 433 (1924).
The issue presented in matters such as this is the availability of the public's money to supply equipment and services that inure in a very real sense to the benefit of individuals. We generally resolve this issue by assessing the benefits to the agency from any such expenditure. Appropriations are available to pay for items ordinarily considered to be personal in nature when the primary benefit of the expenditure accrues to the agency, notwithstanding a collateral benefit to the individual. Of course, an individual is likely to attain at least some collateral benefit from most expenditures such as this, but the potential receipt of a benefit, however real, is not the determining factor. The determining factor is whether, on balance, the individual receives the primary benefit. If the primary beneficiary of an expenditure of public funds is the individual, not the agency or government, the well-established rule is that such expenditures are personal in nature and hence not an authorized use of appropriated funds. See, e.g., B286137, Feb.21, 2001; B243411, July30, 1991; 41Comp. Gen. 387 (1961).
In the past, except where an agency could identify a specific need, we generally viewed kitchen equipment, such as refrigerators, microwaves, and coffee makers, as a personal expense that an employee was expected to bear from his or her own salary. 47 Comp. Gen.657 (1968). To conclude that the cost of such equipment was a proper use of appropriated funds, the agency had to demonstrate that it was difficult for employees to obtain food from local restaurants or other commercial vendors in a reasonable amount of time, and that this affected their ability to adequately carry out their jobs. For example, in B-276601, June 26, 1997, we concluded that the Central Intelligence Agency could purchase a refrigerator for employee use because the headquarters' on-site cafeteria was open only for breakfast and lunch, while employees were required to work during evening hours, and the nearest commercially available eating facility was 10--15 minutes away. In this case, the purchase was reasonably related to the efficient performance of agency activities and was not just for the personal convenience of individual employees. In a similar decision, we did not object to the Naval Medical Command, Department of the Navy, purchasing a microwave oven because the facility operated on a 7 days a week, 24-hour basis, and eating facilities were not readily accessible to department employees. B-210433, Apr.15, 1983. 59ce067264